Posted by Rayn on January 31, 2008, 3:29 pm
 

PC:

CPU: C2D e6850
RAM: 2xDDR2 800 corsair twin 6400 (5-6-6-15 i think)
MB: Asus Commando (updated bios)
COOLER: Thermaltake Big Typhoon VX
PSU: Fortron 400W
GPU Gainward 8800 GT 512
Well ventilated case with sound isolation (foam).

I'm getting huge headaches with this machine. Just installed it and
allready it's overheating (according to Everest) with around 70C at full
load. I can't figure out what's wrong. I'm planning to OC it, but for
now I just can't figure out why it's running so hot? On the other hand,
mesuring with TAT gives a max temp of only 50C. So what gives? which one
of these should I trust?
Tried a few tweak as far as overclocking is concerned but I'm a noob
when it comes to OC-ing intel. So far I think the ram is the weak link.
CPU can easily go as high as 3.6-4GHz, but testing ram with memtest
reveals tons of errors..

..sorry for the chaotic mature of the post but i've been working on this
for the better part of the day and i'm completely lost with this new PC
and can't seem to figure out what's wrong.
Any temerature or overclocking suggestions are apreciated.

Posted by General Schvantzkopf on January 31, 2008, 3:37 pm
 

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:29:24 +0100, Rayn wrote:


Look at the temperatures in the BIOS, that should give you the correct
values. Once you have a trustworthy temp reading you'll have a way of
telling which of your temp reading programs is giving you the best values.

Posted by Phil Weldon on January 31, 2008, 5:25 pm
 

'General Schvantzkopf' wrote:
| Look at the temperatures in the BIOS, that should give you the correct
| values. Once you have a trustworthy temp reading you'll have a way of
| telling which of your temp reading programs is giving you the best values.
_____

The temperatures shown in the BIOS are of limited value.  When you boot into
the BIOS, four conditions exist:
#1.  The system has just been started, so the CPU temperature will be lower
than normal
#2.  The CPU will be under minimal load, so the temperature will not reflect
normal operating conditions, much less a heavy processor load
#3.  The operating system will not be loaded, so the idle function
implemented by Windows 2000/XP/Vista will not be used
#4.  Any fan and CPU speed stepping you have set in the operating system
will not be operative.

In short, about the only use of BIOS temperatures are to tell if a heatsink
has fallen off.

Phil Weldon

| On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:29:24 +0100, Rayn wrote:
|
| > PC:
| >
| > CPU: C2D e6850
| > RAM: 2xDDR2 800 corsair twin 6400 (5-6-6-15 i think) MB: Asus Commando
| > (updated bios)
| > COOLER: Thermaltake Big Typhoon VX
| > PSU: Fortron 400W
| > GPU Gainward 8800 GT 512
| > Well ventilated case with sound isolation (foam).
| >
| > I'm getting huge headaches with this machine. Just installed it and
| > allready it's overheating (according to Everest) with around 70C at full
| > load. I can't figure out what's wrong. I'm planning to OC it, but for
| > now I just can't figure out why it's running so hot? On the other hand,
| > mesuring with TAT gives a max temp of only 50C. So what gives? which one
| > of these should I trust?
| > Tried a few tweak as far as overclocking is concerned but I'm a noob
| > when it comes to OC-ing intel. So far I think the ram is the weak link.
| > CPU can easily go as high as 3.6-4GHz, but testing ram with memtest
| > reveals tons of errors..
| >
| > ..sorry for the chaotic mature of the post but i've been working on this
| > for the better part of the day and i'm completely lost with this new PC
| > and can't seem to figure out what's wrong. Any temerature or
| > overclocking suggestions are apreciated.
|
| Look at the temperatures in the BIOS, that should give you the correct
| values. Once you have a trustworthy temp reading you'll have a way of
| telling which of your temp reading programs is giving you the best values.



Posted by General Schvantzkopf on January 31, 2008, 10:32 pm
 

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:25:02 -0500, Phil Weldon wrote:


A reboot gets you the temperature at idle which gives you something to
compare to the idle temp when the OS is running. The OP's problem is that
he has two programs that give temps that are 20C apart. Comparing idle
temp to idle temp will allow him to figure out which program is right.

Posted by Phil Weldon on January 31, 2008, 11:44 pm
 

'General Schvantzkopf' wrote:
| A reboot gets you the temperature at idle which gives you something to
| compare to the idle temp when the OS is running. The OP's problem is that
| he has two programs that give temps that are 20C apart. Comparing idle
| temp to idle temp will allow him to figure out which program is right.
_____

No, since the conditions are different, as I point out #1, #2, #3.

And no, since the location of the thermal diodes that TAT use are not the
same as that used by some other CPU sensor reading applets.

And no, since the temperature rise will be greater for TAT as heat
production increases compared to the rise in some other CPU sensor reading
applets.

The Intel description of how TAT operates is a good source for understanding
the differences.

Phil Weldon

| On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:25:02 -0500, Phil Weldon wrote:
|
| > 'General Schvantzkopf' wrote:
| > | Look at the temperatures in the BIOS, that should give you the correct
| > | values. Once you have a trustworthy temp reading you'll have a way of
| > | telling which of your temp reading programs is giving you the best
| > values. _____
| >
| > The temperatures shown in the BIOS are of limited value.  When you boot
| > into the BIOS, four conditions exist:
| > #1.  The system has just been started, so the CPU temperature will be
| > lower than normal
| > #2.  The CPU will be under minimal load, so the temperature will not
| > reflect normal operating conditions, much less a heavy processor load
| > #3.  The operating system will not be loaded, so the idle function
| > implemented by Windows 2000/XP/Vista will not be used #4.  Any fan and
| > CPU speed stepping you have set in the operating system will not be
| > operative.
| >
| > In short, about the only use of BIOS temperatures are to tell if a
| > heatsink has fallen off.
| >
| > Phil Weldon
| >
| > 2008 21:29:24 +0100, Rayn wrote: |
| > | > PC:
| > | >
| > | > CPU: C2D e6850
| > | > RAM: 2xDDR2 800 corsair twin 6400 (5-6-6-15 i think) MB: Asus
| > Commando | > (updated bios)
| > | > COOLER: Thermaltake Big Typhoon VX | > PSU: Fortron 400W
| > | > GPU Gainward 8800 GT 512
| > | > Well ventilated case with sound isolation (foam). | >
| > | > I'm getting huge headaches with this machine. Just installed it and
| > | > allready it's overheating (according to Everest) with around 70C at
| > full | > load. I can't figure out what's wrong. I'm planning to OC it,
| > but for | > now I just can't figure out why it's running so hot? On the
| > other hand, | > mesuring with TAT gives a max temp of only 50C. So what
| > gives? which one | > of these should I trust?
| > | > Tried a few tweak as far as overclocking is concerned but I'm a noob
| > | > when it comes to OC-ing intel. So far I think the ram is the weak
| > link. | > CPU can easily go as high as 3.6-4GHz, but testing ram with
| > memtest | > reveals tons of errors..
| > | >
| > | > ..sorry for the chaotic mature of the post but i've been working on
| > this | > for the better part of the day and i'm completely lost with
| > this new PC | > and can't seem to figure out what's wrong. Any
| > temerature or | > overclocking suggestions are apreciated. |
| > | Look at the temperatures in the BIOS, that should give you the correct
| > | values. Once you have a trustworthy temp reading you'll have a way of
| > | telling which of your temp reading programs is giving you the best
| > values.
|
| A reboot gets you the temperature at idle which gives you something to
| compare to the idle temp when the OS is running. The OP's problem is that
| he has two programs that give temps that are 20C apart. Comparing idle
| temp to idle temp will allow him to figure out which program is right.



This Thread
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
---> Re: Help with new PC General Schvant...01-31-2008
please rate this thread