how to see with which stuff the processor core is most occupied

 
and with which stuff is overburdened and to bridge it on the very sole
things i'm working with this system ?

I0m working in XP professional now and i would like to adjust third
programs as main stuff processor working on, so that all programs i'm
working in are the primary tasks processor-ram- has to occupy with


what could be done in that manner ==?

 CliscoCliso wrote:

Download Process Explorer, and it will tell you everything you need
to know about your programs, and what they use in terms of resources.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653

You can use Task Manager as well, to get some useful information
while the programs are running.

    Paul

 
Thanks, i already have a processExplorer engaged turned on,
but it only gives me the information about the processes...
it gives me PID informations, CPU  usage, but ok i do have a priority
list to cahnge,
and there is a private bytes list and properties tab with a bunch of
informations.

The question is what to do to change computer bahavings ?

I have a 2.8Ghz/1MB cache P4 cpu  in IBM computer  with 2x512MB DDR400
old DDR1 ram and it's just a computer for opening documents and
searching in files and eventually going on the internet to see stuff.
I did put this cpu as i intended to fry it over the PLL options, to
clock it somehow...but i doubt it is about the FSB frequency which is
lacking but it is something with the processes, i would say the order
of processes CPU is working on.  This order is not as i would put
it(but this is a whole huge domena of programming which is not am
capable to learn in a sec. this is a lifetime of engineering and
learning, a job for a smart programmer i would say that)...

OK, i have a big consuming program an antivirus which is chewing up
something in CoreServiceShell on each computer i have installed this
antivirus. But it's not about this program, it's about the strength o
this cpu which is presumably looking at Gigahertz strength very would
need to be a very stregnthy toy to play with. This machine would need
to process this stuff i'm working on with a klip-klop with two fingers
when you say ..a sec.

I would say a hardware and a little of programs-utilities toys would
be my schema to approach the core, but as i'm a lazy dumb ass, i
really don't see where to start first to solve this issue.

Numerous guys have the same sole problem looking for a solution, they
just want and only want just particular programs and stuff to work
with and that that particularly stuff work superfast. With today
technology and commands which controll the complete system that would
need to be "easy" to do.

 

I saw a an noteook from 2000. working a lot faster than today
notebooks do with their technology.

meaning ragarding low resources programs, ulitlities and stuff like
that...
there was no notebook applications hangings etc.etc. we call that a
little beast of machine.

 CliscoCliso wrote:

I had a problem yesterday, trying to run Indexing under Windows 7. And
after some research, it appeared that while the Indexing process was running,
the antivirus program was reading all the same files (twice as many
read operations). Because of that kind of behavior, the performance
of a computer can be drastically reduced. I turned off the AV software,
increased the Index process priority, and also made one registry change,
to speed up the process - and it still took about three hours.

Your 2.8GHz/1MB P4 will have Hyperthreading, fooling the OS into thinking
you have two processing cores. That helps when one process is blocked
waiting on a memory access, and Hyperthreading can make the OS seem a
bit more responsive.

If you need to raise the priority of a process, you can do that from
Task Manager. This doesn't help a lot, but if you need every bit of
performance possible, you can try it. Try "Above Normal" or "High" and
see if it helps. If the AV software is interfering, disable the
AV software temporarily until the compute intensive activity is
finished.

http://devilsworkshop.org/files/2007/10/windows-task-manager.jpg

    Paul