Posted by UCLAN on November 30, 2006, 1:17 am
  kony wrote:


Shall we start posting message IDs where *YOU* ignored giving an
answer to a poster's specific question, but instead explained what
*YOU* thought was a better solution?

Posted by kony on November 30, 2006, 1:20 pm
 On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:17:28 -0800, UCLAN


If you're  so upset that you want to spend the time doing
that, if it'd make you feel better - have fun with it.

Posted by UCLAN on November 30, 2006, 1:24 am
  kony wrote:


The OP asked ONE specific question:

"Which wireless mouse has the longest battery life?"

The inescapable answer is a mouse that utilizes a charging cradle.
THREE YEARS plus on the manufacturer supplied batteries.

A specific answer to a specific question.

Posted by kony on November 30, 2006, 1:24 pm
 On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:24:24 -0800, UCLAN


I can see you don't understand the predominate definition of
battery life, but the curious part is that it still escaped
your understanding even after the OP clearly stated a desire
for Duracell alkalines instead of rechargeables.  Again I
suggest you read what the OP wrote, I don't know how the OP
could have made it any clearer.

This thread is a waste of our time, be content that we don't
have to agree.

Posted by UCLAN on November 30, 2006, 2:57 pm
 kony wrote:


Again, the OP asked *ONE*, and only one, specific question:

"Which wireless mouse has the longest battery life?"

Have you an example where the mouse operates for over THREE YEARS
on the same manufacturer supplied batteries, without ever removing
the batteries? No, I didn't think so.

This Thread
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
please rate this thread