On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:44:33 -0600, Mitch Crane

a 15" size, so I didn't ignore the OP's question and jump
right to an alternative instead.

Actually it's quite likely OP would forget to put it in the
cradle every now and then, so the batteries would need
swapped.
a 15" size, so I didn't ignore the OP's question and jump
right to an alternative instead.
Actually it's quite likely OP would forget to put it in the
cradle every now and then, so the batteries would need
swapped.
Nonetheless, he stated he wanted to use 1024x768 and you gave advice
about using 1280x1024.
Possibly. He can make that judgement with the given info. Just as you
felt that poster would get used to the higher resolution, I feel this
one will get used to using a charging stand.
--
ybbxvatyvxrnobeantnvayvivatyvxrnurergvpyvfgravatgbneguheyrrerpbeqfznxv
atnyylbhesevraqfsrryfbthvyglnobhggurveplavpvfznaqgurerfgbsgurvetrareng
vbaabgriragurtbireazragnertbaanfgbclbhabjohgnerlbhernqlgborurnegoebxra
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:54:03 -0600, Mitch Crane

OP didn't ask what you felt could be gotten used to. With
the monitor thread my primary reply, possibly even the first
sentence I typed was the direct answer to the question. In
this thread, I don't see ANY direct reply to the question
from you. That's quite different than adding it as
supplimental information, rather you seem set on the idea
that the OP *must* want what you do, when the only thing
written suggests quite the opposite.
OP didn't ask what you felt could be gotten used to. With
the monitor thread my primary reply, possibly even the first
sentence I typed was the direct answer to the question. In
this thread, I don't see ANY direct reply to the question
from you. That's quite different than adding it as
supplimental information, rather you seem set on the idea
that the OP *must* want what you do, when the only thing
written suggests quite the opposite.
4ax.com:

No and the LCD monitor guy didn't ask if you felt he could get used to
1280 x 1024. yet you offered.

And it was the wrong answer.

No, as I've said many times (as you well know) I feel it's best to let
him decide whether a rechargeable mouse is a good solution to his
problem. It's you who protested any other solution but yours. I've said
on more than one occasion that your solution, if an alkaline battery
really lasts a year or more, seems quite acceptable.
How about a little intellectual honesty on your part? You say that
UCLANs suggestion is inappropriate and shouldn't be given and then
accuse others of only wanting their suggestion forwarded.
No and the LCD monitor guy didn't ask if you felt he could get used to
1280 x 1024. yet you offered.
And it was the wrong answer.
No, as I've said many times (as you well know) I feel it's best to let
him decide whether a rechargeable mouse is a good solution to his
problem. It's you who protested any other solution but yours. I've said
on more than one occasion that your solution, if an alkaline battery
really lasts a year or more, seems quite acceptable.
How about a little intellectual honesty on your part? You say that
UCLANs suggestion is inappropriate and shouldn't be given and then
accuse others of only wanting their suggestion forwarded.
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:16:19 -0600, Mitch Crane

You continually think I'm going to agree, instead of
accepting we have a difference of opinion.
Our opinions have been expressed adequately and at this
point there is nothing productive coming from the
discussion... a good point to wait for any further info from
the OP else let the thread die.
You continually think I'm going to agree, instead of
accepting we have a difference of opinion.
Our opinions have been expressed adequately and at this
point there is nothing productive coming from the
discussion... a good point to wait for any further info from
the OP else let the thread die.
This Thread
- Wireless mouse with longest battery life?
- 11-22-2006
![]() Re: Wireless mouse with longest battery life?
| Bucky Breeder | 11-22-2006 |
![]() ![]() Re: Wireless mouse with longest battery life?
| //// Owen \... | 11-23-2006 |
Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options








XML Sitemap
>> pretending that you know better.
>No more than you ignored this very specific request:
> As I understand it if I run at 1024X780 I will experience
> noticeable loss in display quality. If that is correct what
> options do I have to get 1024X768?
>yet you say:
> I feel you would get used to the higher resolution and
> appreciate it. More modern software seems to waste more
> screen space too, it could be hard to work with only
> 1024x768 pretty soon.