If you were  Registered and logged in, you could reply and use other advanced thread options
Page 1 of 6   1 2 3 > last >>
Posted by George on April 13, 2009, 2:04 pm
I want to buy a new printer that can copy as well as print.
Inkjet seems suitable. I guess if I need to be able to copy, then an
allinone is in order. Since I have a router, a network printer would
seem in order, but USB will do.

I do not want trouble, which I have had with my present HP C7280 AIO.

Someone recommend something?

TX
George

Posted by Don Schmidt on April 13, 2009, 2:56 pm
I presently have a HP Business Inkjet 1200n (printer only). It's been doing
a good job for the past 3 or 4 years.

I f I were looking to purchase a new printer, be it stand alone or "All In
One" I would check out the Kodak line. They make a good case for their ink;
supposedly cheaper and of;f better quality (pigment). Also, if you have the
room, consider individual printer, scanner, FAX,

In your selection, you may want the scanner to be able to handle 8½"x14"
documents.

--
Don
Vancouver, USA



>I want to buy a new printer that can copy as well as print.
> Inkjet seems suitable. I guess if I need to be able to copy, then an
> allinone is in order. Since I have a router, a network printer would
> seem in order, but USB will do.
> I do not want trouble, which I have had with my present HP C7280 AIO.
> Someone recommend something?
> TX
> George



Posted by CBFalconer on April 13, 2009, 5:52 pm
Don Schmidt wrote:
>
> I presently have a HP Business Inkjet 1200n (printer only). It's been doing
> a good job for the past 3 or 4 years.
>
> I f I were looking to purchase a new printer, be it stand alone or "All In
> One" I would check out the Kodak line. They make a good case for their ink;
> supposedly cheaper and of;f better quality (pigment). Also, if you have the
> room, consider individual printer, scanner, FAX,
>
> In your selection, you may want the scanner to be able to handle 8½"x14"
> documents.

Unless color is essential, I suggest you get a Laser Jet. They get
as low as $99 (US) these days, don't die because of clogged ink,
and are much cheaper and faster.

If you need color, consider what you get with a color laser. It
probably won't be as brilliant as an inkjet, but it will certainly
be cheaper. Prices get down to around $200. (US)

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. Top posting has lost the entire preceding
message(s). See the following links:

<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google)
<http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers)

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



Posted by Don Schmidt on April 14, 2009, 8:32 am


CB,

I'm sorry if my top posting disappoints you. It is an efficiency method I've
acquired in the many years in my Engineering office to file in reverse
chronological order. I find it less efficient to scroll down two or three
feet of a message to find someone posting "Thank you."

Take care,


--
Don - Vancouver, USA
"May your shadow be found in happy places." - Native North American



> Don Schmidt wrote:
>> I presently have a HP Business Inkjet 1200n (printer only). It's been
>> doing
>> a good job for the past 3 or 4 years.
>> I f I were looking to purchase a new printer, be it stand alone or "All
>> In
>> One" I would check out the Kodak line. They make a good case for their
>> ink;
>> supposedly cheaper and of;f better quality (pigment). Also, if you have
>> the
>> room, consider individual printer, scanner, FAX,
>> In your selection, you may want the scanner to be able to handle 8½"x14"
>> documents.
> Unless color is essential, I suggest you get a Laser Jet. They get
> as low as $99 (US) these days, don't die because of clogged ink,
> and are much cheaper and faster.
> If you need color, consider what you get with a color laser. It
> probably won't be as brilliant as an inkjet, but it will certainly
> be cheaper. Prices get down to around $200. (US)
> Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
> with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
> irrelevant material. Top posting has lost the entire preceding
> message(s). See the following links:
> <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google)
> <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers)
> --
> [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
> Try the download section.
>



Posted by CBFalconer on April 14, 2009, 2:54 pm


Don Schmidt wrote:
>
> I'm sorry if my top posting disappoints you. It is an efficiency
> method I've acquired in the many years in my Engineering office
> to file in reverse chronological order. I find it less efficient
> to scroll down two or three feet of a message to find someone
> posting "Thank you."

Did you read the referances I posted? There never should be two or
three feet of message for something like that. Anything not
germane to the reply should have been snipped. This keep articles
short and understandable. Top posting is NOT efficient, and is
highly annoying.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



Page 1 of 6   1 2 3 > last >>
Bookmark this page: Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon Feed Icon
  •  
  • Subject
  • Author
  • Date
  • Subject
  • Date