Recommend a new printer?

  I want to buy a new printer that can copy as well as print.
Inkjet seems suitable.  I guess if I need to be able to copy, then an
allinone is in order.  Since I have a router, a network printer would
seem in order, but USB will do.

I do not want trouble, which I have had with my present HP C7280 AIO.

Someone recommend something?

TX
George

 I presently have a HP Business Inkjet 1200n (printer only).  It's been doing
a good job for the past 3 or 4 years.

I f I were looking to purchase a new printer, be it stand alone or "All In
One" I would check out the Kodak line.  They make a good case for their ink;
supposedly cheaper and of;f better quality (pigment).  Also, if you have the
room, consider individual printer, scanner, FAX,

In your selection, you may want the scanner to be able to handle 8½"x14"
documents.

--
Don
Vancouver, USA

  Don Schmidt wrote:

Unless color is essential, I suggest you get a Laser Jet.  They get
as low as $99 (US) these days, don't die because of clogged ink,
and are much cheaper and faster.

If you need color, consider what you get with a color laser.  It
probably won't be as brilliant as an inkjet, but it will certainly
be cheaper.  Prices get down to around $200.  (US)

Please do not top-post.  Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material.  Top posting has lost the entire preceding
message(s).  See the following links:

  <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
  <http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
  <http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
  <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>   (taming google)
  <http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/>   (newusers)

--
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.

 

CB,

I'm sorry if my top posting disappoints you. It is an efficiency method I've
acquired in the many years in my Engineering office to file in reverse
chronological order. I find it less efficient to scroll down two or three
feet of a message to find someone posting "Thank you."

Take care,


--
Don - Vancouver, USA
"May your shadow be found in happy places." - Native North American

 

Don Schmidt wrote:

Did you read the referances I posted?  There never should be two or
three feet of message for something like that.  Anything not
germane to the reply should have been snipped.  This keep articles
short and understandable.  Top posting is NOT efficient, and is
highly annoying.

--
 [mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
 [page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
            Try the download section.