Posted by Anne Onime on September 14, 2010, 10:17 pmPlease Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
I got this program and tried it out on all the PCs that I
have, right back to an ancient AT mainboard with K6-3.
Now what I noticed was the cache bandwidth on this oldie
was very poor, about same as memory write. This mainboard
has a cache chip, which becomes L3 as the K6-3 has L2.
So I think Crystal Mark is testing not the L1 but the
outermost cache, which in this case is running at FSB
hence pretty sluggish compared to internal cache.
Is this so?
Posted by Paul on September 15, 2010, 12:30 am
Anne Onime wrote:
There are some benchmarking utilities, that draw a curve of
bandwidth versus test transfer size. The inflection points
in the curve, tell you the size of the various caches. You can
use a tool that runs this kind of curve, and look to see
how many levels of cache are present.
There were a few motherboards, back in that era, that
shipped with "empty" or "duff" cache on the motherboard.
Someone actually had the nerve to solder chips on the
motherboard, with no silicon die inside them. The result
would be, a missing level of caching.
This is another one of the cache benchmarking utilities.
RightMark Memory Analyzer v3.8 (available in RAR archive or as EXE)
It gives pretty nice looking graphs. The processors here here
have two levels of cache. The fun part of the tool, is
getting the graph as a .bmp later. You use the "results"
tab, it delivers tabular data on the screen, but there is a
button to click to save as .bmp . And then you can have your
very own graph like this.
Posted by Orson Cart on September 15, 2010, 10:03 pm
Please Register and login to reply and use other advanced options
- Posted In
- Why does this memory intensive C++ program get poor memory access speed?
- Computer Hardware
- Subscribe via RSS